Nationalism vs Regressive Left seems to be the norm of the political discourse in many a country. In many countries, a sudden rise in Nationalism as a counter to Socialism seems to follow a global pattern, especially after Socialism degraded into Regressive Left.
Regressive Left is that variant of Left Politics which forces you to be inclusive with something which is inherently incompatible to inclusivity – like Islam.
Protests against India’s passing of Citizenship Amendment Act which provides citizenship to persecuted minorities of certain countries is a clear example of how things can pan out. While there is no logic for an Indian to protest that a Pakistani Muslim is not getting Citizenship in India, India has erupting into protests over such flimsy a result and Indian opposition throwing full weight behind the protests is a clear example of how the Regressive Leftist Ecosystem works.
A repeat is seen in Britain where the nationalist Boris Johnson is faced with #NotMyPM protests as a response to the historic drubbing Labour Party faced. The British example is a perfect way to tell the problem with America and America opposition. Britain need not bother about an internal issue in India – Kashmir. But, we saw Britain erupt in protests over this, leading to rioting in the heart of London’s tourist district and other areas and Labour throwing it’s weight overwhelmingly. We covered it in details in our previous article Sadiq Khan’s Londonistan: Fear Psychosis And Destruction Of Tourism.
While nationalist Britain supported India, the Regressive Leftist version of Britain led by Pakistan supporting Labour – an unproductive but loyal vote base which is famed for dishing out terrorists frequently.
Though this is not exactly applicable for USA, this should be seen as a microcosm of what America is facing. Ilhan Omar’s stand completely opposite to decades of American posturing, Democrat lobby picking on India over Kashmir and Citizenship Amendment Act at a time when ties between both the countries are at it’s historic high points in the direction.
A direct comparison of what Trump and Republicans are offering and what the Democrat Lobby is offering will show the divergence in the stand.
President Donald Trump Impeachment in House of Representatives
The Democratic-led House of Representatives voted largely along party lines to impeach US President Donald Trump for obstruction of Congress and abuse of power over his dealings with Ukraine.
The abuse of power article passed 230-197 with one lawmaker, Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, voting present. One independent supported President Donald Trump Impeachment and two Democrats opposed both articles of impeachment, along with every Republican. One Democrat split votes, supporting the abuse of power article but not obstruction of Congress.
The obstruction of Congress article passed 229-198 with Gabbard voting present.
Democrats accuse Trump of pressuring Ukraine to open an investigation into the president’s political rival and former vice president, Joe Biden, who is also a frontrunner in the 2020 Democratic presidential race. They also charge that the president obstructed their investigation by refusing to comply with subpoenas and directing members of his administration to do the same.
The articles of impeachment are now expected to be sent to the Senate, where senators will consider evidence, hear witnesses and vote to acquit or convict the president. The chief justice of the US Supreme Court presides over the trial.
A two-thirds majority vote is required in the 100-member Senate to convict and remove a president from office. A conviction appears unlikely in the case of Trump.
The Senate is made up of 53 Republicans, 45 Democrats and two independents who caucus with the Democrats. At least 20 Republicans would have to vote with all Democrats and the two independents to remove the president from office.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has indicated that he would like swift proceedings, but the president has said he would not mind a robust trial, with testimony from a number of witnesses, including Biden and the whistle-blower whose complaint led to the President Donald Trump Impeachment inquiry.
Withholding the articles of impeachment may give the Democrats leverage when it comes to setting the procedures for the trial.
Pelosi said Democrats will make a decision on next steps as “a group”.
McConnell blasted the Democrats though for not immediately sending the articles to the Senate.
He accused Pelosi of being afraid to send “their shoddy work product to the Senate”.
“The framers built the Senate to provide stability, to keep partisan passions from boiling over,” he said from the Senate floor. “Moments like this are why the United States Senate exists.”
Once the Senate receives the articles of impeachment, a trial can begin.
No firm date for a Senate trial has been set, but McConnell has said it will be the chamber’s “first order of business” upon returning to Washington, DC, in the new year.
Senate Democrats have proposed a trial plan that would see proceedings begin on January 6. Presentations by House managers, who would effectively work as prosecutors, would begin on January 9 under this plan. It is unlikely that Senate Republicans would agree to the Democrats’ exact proposal.
As the vote was conducted, Trump was at a “Merry Christmas” campaign rally in Battle Creek, Michigan.
“After three years of sinister witch hunts, hoaxes, scams, the House Democrats are trying to nullify the ballots of tens of millions of patriotic Americans,” he said.
Big Mistake of Democrats
Linking Trump with Russia and repeated attempts at President Donald Trump Impeachment is a clear example of what America is facing today. The mistakes of Obama Regime like the Ukrainian Revolution which America had no way to back and forcing Russia to retaliate, and the attempt to normalize ties with Russia which only strengthened the Iranians further and their impact on American geopolitics attributed to Trump is but an example. It is logically possible that Russia will try to defeat Hillary Clinton, Obama’s Secretary of State. Whether there are facts supporting this or not, this can be a whiplash against Trump. Same goes for a belligerent Iran. Mexican Wall is another prickly issue between both the ends. While the migrants will provide a loyal vote base, they are a security hazard and a drain on economy. After all, Mexico itself is a resilient economy and is capable of providing jobs. It’s up to the readers to understand who are those who are crossing from Mexico into America
Iran – Nuclear Controversy
From the beginning the Iran Nuclear Deal entered during Obama era known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was a bad agreement for the United States and allies in the region. That’s because it only paused Iran’s nuclear project, instead of ending it, and did nothing to stop Iran’s aggression against its neighbors, or its support of terrorism, or its brutal repression of the Iranian people. Moreover $150 Billion of Iranian assets held abroad that were frozen until a deal was reached in 2015 to curb Iran’s nuclear program and ease sanctions. Tehran was then allowed access to its funds.
Question arises, how did Iran get the nuclear technology at the first place? Which Country helped proliferate Nuclear Technology to Iran? What Santions were placed against that country?
Answer is It was Pakistan that proliferated Nuclear Technology to Iran. In 2003, Pakistan admitted that Pakistan was the source of the nuclear know-how and equipment for Iran’s uranium enrichment programme, a sophisticated and extensive project which has been kept secret for 18 years.
Pakistan under intense pressure from western countries and from the international atomic energy agency, the UN’s nuclear watchdog, to clarify its suspected role in supplying Iran with nuclear information and technology, conceded that some of its nuclear experts might have acted out of “ambition or greed” in supplying nuclear technology.
US press reports also put the spotlight on Pakistan for aiding North Korea in its nuclear weapons programme; and with Libya admitting at the weekend that it had built a pilot uranium enrichment centrifuge facility using imported equipment, questions are also being asked about Pakistan’s possible role in providing that technology.
However despite the evidences, the Islamist Nation that always lies, always lied and denied any nuclear equipment or technology transferred to Iran, North Korea or Libya and the escaped any sanctions.
What Action did Democrats take against Pakistan, that is the trouble creator in the world? Pakistan was rewarded with $33 Billion in the name of War Against Terror in Afghanistan. 2,400 American service members have died. Additionally, over 20,000 U.S. service members have been wounded in hostile action in Afghanistan fighting Pakistan supported Taliban Terrorists. Even the Master mind of 9/11 had links with Pakistan. Biggest of all Osama Bin Laden was found hidden in Pakistan near to their Army camp.
Whereas President Donald Trump saved the world from the worst of the JCPOA when he withdrew America from it last year and imposed broad new economic sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran and its leaders. Besides that President Trump also stopped most of the payments to the Terrorist Nation Pakistan.
Result is that the Democrats are being supported by Islamic Terrorist nation Pakistan and the Jihadist umbrella organization Muslim Brotherhood.
Republicans see immigration as a critical threat to the country, say restricting immigration makes the US safer, and support using US troops to stop migrants from crossing into the United States. Democrats, on the other hand, do not consider immigration a critical threat, and their views on policy actions substantially and consistently differ from Republicans.
Whole Europe that entertained millions of Radical Islamist as refugees, has witnessed what the illegal Radical Islamist can do. Over 2000 Churches have been desecrated in France alone. Famous one was Notre Dame Cathedral though the official cause of fire is not yet found, but people attribute it to the rise of Political Islam in destroying Churches in Europe. We covered about it in details in our previous article Notre Dame Cathedral Fire – Was The Investigation A Sham To Cover Up For French Govt Policy Failures? Is French Government Hiding The Truth?
London headed by a Pakistani Sadiq Khan is an example how a city that was once a tourist destination, has now become a third world city.
The recent lesson can be learnt from India where millions of illegal Radical Islamist infiltrators from Bangladesh and Rohingya Terrorists who committed Genocide of Buddhists and Hindus in Myanmar have infiltrated into India and are burning all the Cities in India.
In 2015 on several occasions, Trump asserted that “If you’re from Syria and you’re a Christian, you cannot come into this country, and they’re the ones that are being decimated. If you are Islamic … it’s hard to believe, you can come in so easily.”
All these Islamist are the vote bank of Democrats and are living in the sanctuary cities as freeloaders on taxpayers money. Who bears the cost of these freeloaders? It is the US Taxpayers who have to pay higher costs. Did they contribute anything productive in making America Great? No, in fact the crime rates in the sanctuary cities increased. FBI uncovered homegrown terror training camp in Alabama run by these freeloaders. Have the Democrats turned Anti-American that they are shielding Terrorists in the US for their extra votes? Or is it because of the promise of extra money for their election campaigns that they do whatever they are told to do?
As per the data Estimates of the number of undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. range from 10.5 million to 12 million, or approximately 3.2%–3.6% of the population.
Immigrants from Mexico have recently, for the first time, fallen to less than half of the undocumented population.
Immigrants from Mexico have recently, for the first time since 1990, represented less than half of the undocumented population. According to Pew, in 2017, about 4.95 million of the 10.5 million undocumented population were from Mexico, 1.9 million from Central America, and 1.45 million from Asia.
In January 2017, Trump signed Executive Order 13767, which formally directed the U.S. government to begin attempting wall construction along the Mexican border.
Wall is a protection from illegal immigrants entering via Mexico border. However, Democrats like Ilhan Omar and others who are the Islamist mouthpiece in the US will get in more Radical Islamists if the immigration Policy are not strengthened.
Relationship of Democrats versus Republicans with Friendly Countries
Jeremy Shapiro, who served as an adviser in the US state department under Barack Obama, said the relationship was “unrequited”.
He told the Cheltenham Literature Festival that while officials publicly stressed the importance of the relationship, in private they mocked the idea, making jokes about the Falklands.
Mr Shapiro said he would insert references to the Malvinas – the Argentine name for the Falkland islands – into press conferences.
The Falkland Islands remain a disputed territory years after war broke out between Argentina and Britain in 1982. The violence resulted in the deaths of 655 Argentine and 255 British servicemen.
Mr Shapiro, who served as a senior adviser to the assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian Affairs between 2009 and 2013, told an audience the US-UK bond “was never really something that was very important to the United States”.
“From my perspective it was very important for us to mention the special relationship in every press conference that we had when the UK were here,” he said
“But really we laughed about it behind the scenes. Typically, I would try and slip in a reference to the Malvinas or something to spoil it.”
Whereas under republicans, US President Donald Trump has said talks about a “very substantial” trade deal with the UK are under way.
He said a bilateral post-Brexit deal could lead to a “three to four, five times” increase in current trade.
While the Republicans led by President Trump favored good relations with India which is now on a par with America’s NATO allies Japan, Australia and South Korea following passage of a bill (The National Defense Authorisation Act or NDAA) by the US Senate in a key move to increase defence partnership including advanced technology transfer.
Whereas Democrats are bent on destroying this relationship between US and India. While UN and all other nations (Except Pakistan, Turkey and Malaysia) accepted that abrogation of Article 370 of Indian Constitution was an internal affair of India, Democrats that are supported by Pakistan were shouting at the top of their voices.
Recently Congressional Hearing on Kashmir and the rants of House Foreign Affairs Committee that is responsible for foreign policy legislation and oversight condemned India on the Citizenship Amendment Bill 2019 that grants citizenship to persecuted minorities (Hindus, Christians and others) in three Islamist Radical Cuntries of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. What is the concern of Democrats when the Citizenship is given to Christians and Hindus who are oppressed? The reason can be found with the support these Democrats are enjoying from the Umbrella organizations of Muslim Brotherhood and their love for the Terrorist Nation Pakistan.
Democrats like Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib hate Israel & all Jewish people, & there is nothing that can be said or done to change their minds. Both have supported the boycott movement against Israel. Twice the House voted on a resolution denouncing hate speech following controversial comments by Omar.
Whereas Republicans are strengthening their relationship with Israel.
During Barack Obama’s presidency, however, some of the underlying foundations of the US-Israel “special relationship” were challenged and the outcome was noticeable discord and ongoing diplomatic friction between Washington and Jerusalem.
On the other hand, On December 6, 2017, US President Donald Trump announced the United States recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and ordered the planning of the relocation of the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
Recently in November 2019, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the Trump administration is reversing the Obama administration’s approach toward Israeli settlements. “The establishment of Israeli civilian settlement in the West Bank is not per se inconsistent with international law,” said Pompeo. He added that the “ultimate status” of the West Bank is a “complex political problem that can only be solved by negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians.”
What are these people achieving by burning America to satisfy their politics? Every American should ask this question.
Follow us at:-
Twitter Handle: @communique_news
Parler Handle: @newscommuniquecom
Subscribe our : YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnKJQ3gFsRVWpvdjnntQoAA
Like our Facebook Page https://m.facebook.com/News-Communiquecom-103788531007438/
799 total views